Board of Education Preparing for Budget Season

The board is investigating cost-saving measures like an early retirement package, and discussing costs to conduct a search for a new school superintendent.

The Newtown Board of Education spent much of its meeting on Nov. 20 looking for ways to save money in the 2013-14 school budget.

The next budget cycle is likely to be difficult, because the school budget will be bifurcated, voted on separately from the town budget, and there are few ideas for saving money that the board hasn’t already tried.

The board hasn’t given up on offering an early retirement for teachers, but so far the prospects that it might save any sizeable amount of money are looking slim.

Members of the board’s finance subcommittee met with Bill Sudol, a retired state Teachers Retirement Fund employee, who analyzed the board’s early retirement incentive offers and reported that they probably wouldn’t save much money.


Have you signed up for the Newtown Patch newsletter, "liked" us on Facebook and followed us on Twitter yet?


The two alternatives floated earlier this Fall were to pay to continue retirees’ medical insurance or a cash offer known as the Ohio Plan, in which the board would help retirees buy additional years of pension eligibility. The aim is to replace teachers at the highest pay grade with younger teachers paid tens of thousands of dollars a year less.

According to subcommittee members Richard Gaines and William Hart, Sudol told them the problem is the incentives could cost almost as much as the savings from the retirements. In some cases, a saving of $30,000 for an individual retirement might be offset by an incentive costing $25,000.

Hart said he questioned whether a savings of just $5,000 per retirement was worth losing some of the most talented, veteran teachers in the district.

This and other difficult budget decisions are approaching a deadline, because the board must approve a 2013-14 budget request by the end of January. BOE Chairman Debbie Leidlein asked the subcommittee to keep trying and report back next month.

Academic Standards Come With Cost

School Supt. Dr. Janet Robinson reported that the state’s new academic standards and teacher evaluation procedures are unfunded mandates that could have expensive budget implications.

The core standards require additional teacher training on addressing dating violence among students, and the new evaluation process will require at least six classroom observations per teacher, she said.

Robinson said at a recent CABE (Connecticut Association of Boards of Education) conference, educators and school board officials wondered where they would get the money for these things.

Funding a New Superintendent Search

In regard to the search for a new superintendent, school district Business Manager Ron Bienkowski said the headhunter firm that conducted the last superintendent search in 2007 estimated a new search would cost between $25,000 and $30,000.

That is much lower than Bienkowski’s original cost estimate of around $80,000, which he admitted was only included in his earlier budget report as a “place holder” until a more accurate estimate was received.

He said one factor, advertising costs, might be substantially less than in 2007, because now it would use more internet advertising, which is cheaper than print ads the 2007 search relied on.

Veritas vos liberabit December 03, 2012 at 04:26 PM
Rasmussen, Let the Newtown citizens take care of Newtown's education system, so far they have done a superb job (they educated you didn't they?). Does Florida have the Patch? Perhaps you should address problems were you live! JULY 17, 2012 Florida's education funding unfair to poor students, report says Facebook 33 Email Share 44 The Florida Board of Education will continue its discussion on 2013-14 funding during its meeting this morning. A new report from the Education Law Center and Rutgers University offers some insight that board members might want to keep in mind. Is School Funding Fair? A National Report Card gives Florida poor marks in all four of the categories used to determine whether states provide adequate funding to account for the added needs of students in poverty. The group ranks Florida: • 40th in funding level (overall level of state and local revenue provided to school districts, comparing each state’s average per-pupil revenue with other states) • 45th for coverage (proportion of school age children in public vs. nonpublic schools) • D for funding distribution (distribution of funding across local districts within a state, relative to student poverty) • F for state effort (state spending vs. per capital gross domestic product) Overall, the report places Florida alongside Missouri and North Carolina as "low-effort, regressive states."
Paul Alexander December 03, 2012 at 04:39 PM
Sully, No one, including me, is arguing that Newtown is doing a poor job educating its students. The argument centers on the cost/benefit of the school budget. Dude, really, you twist everything. It's killing me right now to even respond to your lame attempts at critical thinking. THE argument is...Can Newtown do the same job for less money. Obviously anyone and everyone who is a stakeholder in ever increasing school budgets will say "No". But ever increasing budgets are unsustainable in the fiscal environment we will live in for at least the next five years, probably 10 years. Those who have to fork over the ever increasing tax payments while living in a flat to deceasing real income world say HELL YES! The fat years are over. Time for Newtown schools to do more with less. Everyone else is. And Sully, go bang your head against your desk cuz ; A. It might improve your IQ, and B. It will distract you from my posts which I assure you will keep coming until fiscal sanity returns to Newtown.
Veritas vos liberabit December 03, 2012 at 05:16 PM
Rasmussen - • F for state effort (state spending vs. per capital gross domestic product) Overall, the report places Florida alongside Missouri and North Carolina as "low-effort, regressive states." No COMMENT ?
Paul Alexander December 03, 2012 at 05:19 PM
Jim Sullivan/Sully/McMurphy, The Patch article is titled "Board of Education Preparing for (Newtown) Budget Season". Focus Sully. And quit wasting bandwidth.
Paul Alexander December 03, 2012 at 06:22 PM
THIS is why municipal budgets, and the taxes that fund those budgets, MUST stop rising. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-12-02/guest-post-personal-income-and-spending-weigh-economic-recovery-hopes Real (inflation adjusted) personal incomes are FALLING. This is a long term trend that will continue. Municipal governments need to accept the reality of doing the same, or more, with LESS money. That has been the reality for many families and businesses for a few years now. Municipal budgets don’t get a pass from fiscal reality just because they spend other people’s money or because the Superintendent or First Selectman are nice people.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »