Published Gun Permit Info Couldn't Happen Here

In the wake of the Newtown shootings, when the Journal News newspaper printed the names and addresses of legal gun permit holders in three New York counties, the reaction was swift and harsh. But it couldn't happen here.

In response to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings, one New York state newspaper featured the names and addresses of all pistol permit holders in three counties. 

That won't be happening here in Connecticut because state law prohibits it, CT News Junkie reports.

For almost 20 years the information has been exempt from public disclosure, the website reports, after it was included as a trade-off in a bill that made it more difficult for convicted felons to buy guns. 

In New York State, that information falls under that state's Freedom of Information laws, so the Journal News was able to obtain lists of individuals who legally hold gun permits. It published the names and addresses of those people, which resulted in an outcry from pro-gun supporters and residents alike.

In response, some circulated on blogs and on Facebook the names, home addresses and phone numbers of the Journal News editors and reporters involved in the story, including Editor Cyndee Royle, Publisher Janet Hasson and Reporter Dwight R. Worley.

They also posted pictures from the newspaper employee's Facebook pages showing their family members and the cars they drive.

Since the Dec. 14 shootings in Newtown, there has been an increase in the number of people looking to obtain a gun permit in Connecticut, the Register-Citizen reports. There's also been an unusually large increase in gun sales reported both in Connecticut and throughout the country, which many attribute to fears that President Obama and Congress will now enact tougher gun laws that could include a return of the assault rifle ban and a ban on high capacity magazines.

Bill Hillman January 02, 2013 at 05:22 AM
The editor of that newspaper has an armed guard now http://www.rocklandtimes.com/2013/01/01/the-journal-news-is-armed-and-dangerous/
Michael Shea January 02, 2013 at 02:55 PM
It is much easier to own a gun (legally) in CT yet the gun homicide rate in stricter NY is nearly twice as high. New Hampshire has the lowest gun homicide rate in the USA and has very lax gun laws.
Aunt Rose January 02, 2013 at 03:12 PM
how about some wider sampling? Of the top 15 murder rate states, all except #7 New York have Republican governors and lax gun laws. Florida and Alabama were not included because they did not report 2011 numbers to the FBI. If they did, they would have been included in the top murder rate states, and also with Republican governors and lax gun laws. HIGHEST FIREARMS HOMICIDE RATES (per 100,000 population) .1 10.16 Louisiana .2 7.46 Mississippi .3 5.41 South Carolina .4 5.06 Michigan .5 4.64 Missouri .6 4.39 Arkansas .7 4.12 New York .8 3.97 Pennsylvania .9 3.93 Georgia 10 3.92 Tennessee 11 3.86 North Carolina 12 3.64 Oklahoma 13 3.53 Arizona 14 3.54 Ohio 15 3.29 Indiana
Michael Shea January 02, 2013 at 06:06 PM
Actually, Aunt Rose, Maryland is 5th and you left out the place with the highest firearm homicide rate - Washington DC. The lowest ten rates are in mostly "easy gun" states Wild and free Alaska has nearly the same firearm homicide rate as "gun-banning" Massachusetts (and Massachusetts has twice the rate of armed robberies). Canada has pretty strict gun laws and a very low homicide rate. Mexico has very strict gun laws (they only have one gun store and any purchases must be approved by the Ministry of Defense) yet their gun homicide rate is three times as high as ours.
yinyang January 03, 2013 at 12:28 AM
Gun Threats and Self-Defense (Harvard Study) http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/research/hicrc/firearms-research/gun-threats-and-self-defense-gun-use/index.html
yinyang January 03, 2013 at 12:28 AM
Homicide and Guns http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/research/hicrc/firearms-research/guns-and-death/index.html
yinyang January 03, 2013 at 12:29 AM
yinyang January 03, 2013 at 12:31 AM
Aunt Rose is correct...more guns usually = more death, not less. http://m.newstimes.com/danbury/db_14952/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=XZYuWRgt
Michael Shea January 03, 2013 at 01:16 AM
Thanks for spamming the discussion with studies that include suicides as gun related deaths "yin yang" - but we are talking about murders here.......
yinyang January 03, 2013 at 02:38 AM
Obviously, you didn't read beyond the first sentence.... This is about murder: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/research/hicrc/firearms-research/guns-and-death/index.html
yinyang January 03, 2013 at 02:40 AM
Donald- Tedious only if you have no interest in facts which might disprove what you are so stuck on believing. Only tedious if your mind is so closed that no new info can enter. But I guess that's you?
Michael Shea January 03, 2013 at 03:08 AM
The Harvard papers are just a studies of various other studies based on hypotheses etc. etc. - possible interesting for academics but not a refutation of the actual homicide rates I cited. The Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence study includes suicides. If you include suicides CT has a similar gun "death rate" as Canada. The problem is that the data does not indicate that any existing or proposed gun laws short of complete confiscation will do anything to reduce gun homicides in the US. Furthermore it is a huge, stark, irrefutable fact that when guns were easily bought without any restrictions the homicide rate and the number of mass shootings was much lower. Why was Connecticut in 1912 so much less violent? The guns were available - some other things must have changed.
Bill Hillman January 03, 2013 at 03:28 AM
This is worth watching: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ooa98FHuaU0
yinyang January 03, 2013 at 04:08 AM
Haha.. A "huge, stark, irrefutable fact..." You are laughable...there are so many studies which indicate exactly the opposite of your "huge, stark, blah blah blah"! Open your mind to the facts and stop spouting the nonsense you are determined to believe even if it's not true. Regarding another study from San Francisco... http://m.newstimes.com/danbury/db_14952/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=XZYuWRgt Not that any of this will change a mind which does not want to be changed...but still, facts are facts.
yinyang January 03, 2013 at 04:12 AM
Donald, you are capable of schooling no one, you simply like to hear yourself speak. If you had any real knowledge of the 2nd Ammendmend you would know that the founding fathers envisioned it very differently than the NRA started to spin it in the 70s. You've been schooled by the NRA and they've got you....but the nation is becoming smarter than that. Even George Bush gave up his membership after realizing the true motives of the NRA. You are a dying breed with archaic, outdated views. Adios...
Michael Shea January 03, 2013 at 12:18 PM
Ying that study is for overall gun deaths including suicide. Including suicides distorts the data. You might as well include soldiers in combat and then conclude that guns cause death. And the fact is irrefutable - the murder rate soared in the US during prohibition, dropped after repeal and then soared again in the late 1960's-1980's (after gun laws took effect).


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »