.

Public Hearing Supported Budget Reinstatements

BHS auditorium packed with people who came to speak about education

 

 

The Public Hearing on the town budget was held last night at the Bethel High School.  The packed auditorium was dominated by parents and teachers who  called for a reinstatement of the $400,000 cut from the education budget.  However, there were also many speakers who did not have a vested interest in the education system. 

A line of speakers continued for almost two and a half hours.  Almost no one came to defend the budget cuts.

 In answer to the question of how those cuts would be carried out, Bethel School Superintendent Kevin Smith, Ph.D., said that four teachers would be cut, three from elementary school, and one teacher would be cut from the language program.  He also said that the class sizes would increase.  

 A few Bethel Public Library supporters spoke about reinstating $3,000 to the Library budget.  Tia Murphy, board member of the Library, said, “The library is a real community center.” 

Murphy noted that  66% of Bethel residents have library cards, and that 138,536 people visited the library from 2010-2011. According to Murphy, the $3,000 budget cut would eliminate the purchase of 107 books, or 150 children’s books, or 120 DVDs or 60 audio books.

 Irene Drake, educator and parent, said that a non-partisan Center for American Progress rated Bethel Schools as one of 10 districts where the schools have a high return on their investment.  

 One teacher told the board that whether or not they have a child in the classroom, through real estate values, they benefit from the school system.  

 The only person who did not challenge the cuts was William Michael, Jr.  He offered instead the idea of equally distributing the $400,000 cut throughout each line of the budget.  

 

A world language teacher, said, “There is nothing more inspirational than watching a child experience the power a new language.” 

 Jim Lacey, and many others who attended the evening, said the decision for the cuts should not rest with the Board of Finance.  “Let the voters decide what they can afford or not afford. He offered an Oscar Wilde quote, ‘A cynic is someone who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.’  Let the people decide.  This is not May, or June, after one, two, or God forbid, the third referendum,” Lacey continued.  “We have not gone to referendum and I ask why?”

 Kim Lamone challenged the Board of Finance and said it was only fair for the audience to know exactly which board members have voted for the cuts.  Board Chair Kingston and Tim Draper said yes, and Lamone said that every year, Phil Gallagher has not voted for education, to which he replied that she was out of line, and added, “I am not up here to take personal remarks from you.”

 All three women on the panel voted to keep the budget intact. Lamone said, “Instead of standing here until 11 o’clock at night, can everyone who wants to keep the 400,000 clap?” 

 The question resulted in thunderous applause and a standing ovation by many in the audience.  

 Mary O’Leary, Registrar of Voters, commended the Board of Selectmen and the Board of Finance for a very fair budget and thanked them for not eliminating the non-government agencies. O'Leary also asked that money be added to the library account. She also noted the Registrar of Voters has not had a raise in nine years.  

 Parun Mendiratta spoke passionately about his daughter’s third grade experience, saying the year had changed her as a person. “If I think about who I am today, I think of my parents and teachers above anyone else.  My heart fills with so much respect, not just because they are raising one set of children but they do this year after year after year.  I cannot imagine a group of people who make such an impact. I chose to live in Bethel for the schools.  Put the money back.” 

Bob Legnard thanked the Board of Finance for their hard work, and said, “You have the opportunity to put that money back.”  

 An emotional mother talked about the success of her autistic child in the Bethel school system.  “Until he came to school, he could not speak, he could not look at anyone.  He could not acknowledge someone.  He now reads, writes better than most doctors, and he can do math.  The teachers here are amazing. We have something here that most people in this country, and in this state, do not have.  Pay now or pay later.”  

 Finally, Phil Gallagher defended the Board of Finance by saying that their decisions had to take more than the gathered group into consideration.  “All factors must be weighed.  Income has gone down, the gas prices have gone up $.35 cents a gallon since January, and that’s less money people have to pay their taxes.”

 Gallagher later said, “There will be a charter revision committee, come and tell them to change the way the government works in Bethel.  Do away with the Board of Finance. The BOF filters the demands, what we can afford with what people want. Not just your demands. This is the hardest board to be on.  I have scars all over my body,” bringing laughter to the crowd.

Common Sense April 13, 2012 at 11:27 PM
SmallMinds has none of my user name
SmallMinds April 14, 2012 at 12:00 PM
It is a strawman argument that you raised, Hillman. The notion that "promises were made by people not spending their own money". This is what these people were elected to do. The voters could have elected other people to do it. You employed this logical fallacy as a distraction and a prevarication. The voters designated them as their representatives in negotiations. They are not kids on the town with daddy's 'borrowed' credit card.
J. P. Gallagher April 15, 2012 at 02:29 PM
The Bethel Budget debate will boil down to whether most taxpayers whose incomes have remained stagnant will vote to increase their own taxes in order to give others a raise.
Larry Craybas April 15, 2012 at 03:14 PM
You know how this works, having taught in Brwester and once a staunch union representative. We bargained in good faith, actually under Mr. Kingston's time as Chair of the Board of Education. We negotiated a three year contract that was very competitive compared to other contracts negotiated throughout the state in 2009. We back-loaded the agreement to get GWI and STEPs concessions during the worst years of the economic recession. Right or wrong, hindsight will say that was the right thing to have done at the time. We bargained in good faith and will honor the third year of the agreement. It's not a matter of giving raises at the expense of others. It's a matter of trust, good faith and our legal obligations. If we could turn back the clock we would but you know that is not possible and folly to wish for.
Bill Hillman April 15, 2012 at 03:27 PM
Then it all comes down to the voters willingness to accept or reject a 4.1% tax increase on top of the loss of $200 in property tax credit... or an effective property tax increase of 7% for most, where last year's increase was 3.6% and the year before 3.7%. Compounded over these years, the mill increase would be just under 12%. That's TWELVE PERCENT in 3 years + the loss of the tax credit!. Add the 1/3rd of taxpayers for whom property revaluations will add to the burden even more, the likelihood of sewer fees increasing per warnings from Danbury, and the present proposed budget is simply unaffordable. I support education, but I do not support going broke. I'd vote up to an inflationary tax increase. For the present budget, Larry, I will vocally say no, too high. We will have to agree to disagree on this, but it's up to the voters

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »