.

Is Eliminating the Car Tax a Good Idea?

Writing those checks to the tax assessor is pretty annoying, isn't it? But here's why Patch Back's Lisa Bigelow suspects eliminating this tax may not be such a great idea after all.

 

Who wants to get rid of the car tax? 

If you’re like most Connecticut taxpayers, chances are you thought to yourself, I do! I do! But if you’re the leader of a municipality or a member of your town’s finance board, you probably broke out into a cold sweat.

Few would argue that the Connecticut state car tax is hugely regressive; it’s also unpopular and sending those checks every year is annoying, to be sure. But ask yourself: would you rather pay the car tax as it stands now or possibly face a steep increase in your property taxes?

During last week’s budget address, Governor Dannel Malloy pointed to the elimination of the car tax as a centerpiece of his fiscal plan, along with some other political gimmickry that has legislators and watchdogs shaking their heads in confusion.

The problem is this: municipalities depend on the estimated $560 million the car tax raises to fund local budgets. As proposed, Malloy’s budget does not include a way for municipalities to recoup this lost tax revenue. Since money doesn’t grow on trees (except maybe in Greenwich), municipalities will have to figure out a way to get this revenue back on the books. Probable result? Increased property taxes.

If passed as is, the new budget will exempt the first $20,000 of a car’s assessed value from the tax. Taxpayers in affluent communities may see their taxes go up twice, because those who own cars worth more than $20K will have to pay that tax, plus make up the revenue of those who don’t. And their property taxes may go up anyway.

Republicans now face an odd choice: criticize Malloy for “cutting” taxes or support the cut and potentially wind up in deeper financial waters at home.

It’s unfortunate the governor, who campaigned two years ago on increasing transparency and eliminating one-time budget fixes, is now resorting to the same gimmickry he once criticized. And unfortunately, the shenanigans don’t end there.

Business leaders are complaining that tax hikes due to expire will now be extended under the proposed budget (is a retained tax hike the same thing as raising taxes? The Gov says no). Plus, in a picture perfect example of the sort of unintended irony only government can accomplish, the new budget, presented in a new “streamlined” fashion, caused enormous confusion among legislators who can’t find where line items are located.

But wait! There’s more! In still more budget trickery, Malloy cuts Medicaid coverage for poor parents and aid to hospitals, both of which will presumably benefit from the shift to Obamacare.

The winner? Insurance companies, who will furnish the coverage, while raising rates for everyone else.

Insurance companies will also benefit from the elimination of a state Healthcare Advocate unit funded by the insurance industry that recovers Medicaid funds paid in error. Budget Director Benjamin Barnes said the unit hasn’t been effective, but State Healthcare Advocate Victoria Veltri told the Connecticut Mirror the unit uncovered serious processing errors. It was also hampered by bad data.

But back to the car tax, which may wind up hurting us more than it helps. How will municipalities make up the revenue they so desperately need? With drastic cuts or higher taxes, or maybe even both.

Keep that in mind when it’s time to vote come November 2014. 

John B February 13, 2013 at 03:38 PM
Rough math - 6,000 households, 2 cars per, at $300 a year per car = $3.6mm loss of revenue to town. Spread that $3.6mm to all property owners, and I don't know if i'd call it a "steep increase".
Jaimie Cura (Editor) February 13, 2013 at 05:24 PM
Brian Campana left the following message on our Facebook page: "How about lowering them both and cutting spending? Why is it that the sacrifice always falls on the taxpayer and never on those in and outside of government who are on the receiving end of taxpayer money?" www.facebook.com/bethelpatch
Michael Duff February 13, 2013 at 06:28 PM
At present half the people paying the “car Tax” are overcharged and the other half under charged and each town different again for the same type vehicle. May I suggest that the tax be universal throughout the state; predicated on the gross weight of the car and the average mill rate of the prior year complied from all the municipalities in the state and then adjusted for age?
steven February 14, 2013 at 12:35 AM
Unfortunately for the citizens of Ct., gov Malloy's budget is just more of the same, only difference is he ran on doing less of the same, which also seems to be more of the same. Gimmicks, increasing spending less than anticipated and calling that a decrease, borrowing for today while not paying back last year's borrowing, extending taxes that are supposed to be temporary, calling taxes fees even though they are taxes, cutting proper funding of pensions and healthcare obligations for state workers and teachers, leaving these plans further underfunded, cutting one tax while encouraging other taxes to make up the difference-kicking the can down the road for future generations to somehow tackle! WOW. I was a supporter of the governor, now I feel betrayed!! Bad move gov-just to be re-elected??
Barbara Walter February 15, 2013 at 03:23 PM
I think the car tax should be the same amount of money for everyone who owns a vehicle because every one who owns a vehicle uses the roads and that would be fair and equal.Cutting funding for the elderly why is it that the people that need it the most always get kicked in the head?I also think the elderly should not have to pay any taxes they have paid there dues and now they can not work while others can,why not cut welfare for those that can work . i am not talking about the people that can not work disabled or elderly ect:

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something