Conn. Joins States in Same-Sex Marriage Support

Connecticut and two other states say that the federal "Defense of Marriage Act" is unconstitutional, according to this press release.

The attorney generals of Connecticut, New York and Vermont have jointly asked a federal appeals court to declare the unconstitutionality of a federal law that refuses recognition for same-sex marriages.  

The federal statute, called the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, defines marriage for all federal purposes as “only a legal union between one man and one woman.”

Because of DOMA, married same-sex couples in Vermont and other states are not eligible for a wide range of federal benefits and are treated as unmarried for federal tax purposes.

“These married couples – our friends and neighbors in Vermont – have every right to fair and equal treatment by the federal government,” said Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell. “Instead, they are denied Social Security benefits, tax exemptions, and health and retirement benefits. I am pleased to have worked with New York and Connecticut on this brief urging the Second Circuit to end this discriminatory practice.”

The joint filing by the three states is a “friend of the court” brief in a case pending in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City. The brief emphasizes that states, not the federal government, regulate marriage and family relationships, and argues that Congress does not have authority to refuse recognition for same-sex marriages allowed under state law.

The case is Windsor v. United States, No. 12-2335, pending in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. A Congressional group called the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, or BLAG, is defending DOMA. The U.S. Department of Justice has taken the position that the challenged provision of DOMA is unconstitutional.

Francesco A.A. Mastracchio September 11, 2012 at 01:44 PM
Can the attorneys general act in this capacity or are they overreaching their authority? Also...do I as a voter have any say in how they behave in a given situation or do we accept their personal views that get pronounced through their official capacities? Under whose authority can the speak for an entire state's stance on an issue?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »